Paragraph 193

It hath ever been evident that all these divergences of utterance are attributable to differences of station. Thus, viewed from the standpoint of their oneness and sublime detachment, the attributes of Godhead, Divinity, Supreme Singleness, and Inmost Essence, have been and are applicable to those Essences of being, inasmuch as they all abide on the throne of divine Revelation, and are established upon the seat of divine Concealment. Through their appearance the Revelation of God is made manifest, and by their countenance the Beauty of God is revealed. Thus it is that the accents of God Himself have been heard uttered by these Manifestations of the divine Being.

As Baha'u'llah has now moved on to describe the second station occupied by the Manifestations of God, we would expect Him to talk about it. But it looks as if He has gone back to the first. It seems perplexing.

What He has actually done, though, is introduce the second station, and then reinforce the first to ensure we don't get confused. Remember, He has just told us that we may ""feel perplexed and dismayed" by focusing too much on that second station.

So, He begins this paragraph by referring to the "divergences of utterance (which) are attributable to differences of station". Which station? Presumably that second station, that of distinction, as described in paragraph 191.

Just in case we are not sure what this would look like, let's look at an example.

Remember way back in the Tanakh when Moses said "an eye for an eye"? And then in the Gospel Jesus changed that to "if a man strikes you on the right cheek, offer him your left"? These sure seem different. One seeks justice, while the other commands forgiveness, of a sort.

How can we reconcile these?

Simple, we think.

Imagine if Moses taught us to turn the other cheek. What would have happened? The Jews would still be in Egypt. Moses' mission, getting the Jews out of Egypt, would never have happened.

Now what about if Jesus taught "an eye for an eye"? What would have happened then? Realistically, the Roman legions would have wiped out the early Christians.

You see, the circumstances were very different, and like a good physician, the prescription needed to change in order to help humanity move forward.

But looking at this can be confusing. It can seem as if Moses and Jesus shared different messages, and so Baha'u'llah immediately reminds us of the absolute unity of the Messengers. He does not want us to "feel perplexed and dismayed at the varying utterances pronounced by Manifestations that are essentially one and the same".

When viewed in this light, we can see that both these teachings, an eye for an eye and turning the other cheek, lead us forward. The first takes us from the vengeance of killing someone for hurting us to a more equitable retribution. The second leads us forward to a more forgiving stance. Two steps on the same path.

He then describes their absolute unity again, in slightly different terms. As usual, there seems to be a path in His description.

Looking at it a bit more closely, we notice that "Godhead" comes from the word "God-hood", meaning divine in nature. It is an apt word to describe the Manifestations of God.

Given that, we can look at the four attributes in the second sentence and pair them up with the four phrases found later in the paragraph, giving us:

1. Godhead - throne of divine Revelation
2. Divinity - seat of divine Concealment
3. Supreme Singleness - Revelation of God is made manifest
4. Inmost Essence - Beauty of God is revealed

The Manifestation, or Godhead, is the one who brings the Revelation to humanity. They allow us to get an idea of divinity, which is supremely concealed from our sight, as said so well back in paragraph 104. "He is and hath ever been veiled in the ancient eternity of His Essence, and will remain in His Reality everlastingly hidden from the sight of men."

This brings us forward to Baha'u'llah's message found throughout His revelation,  that first station of the Manifestations which He has been explaining to us since paragraph 161, namely that station of absolute and essential unity, through which we can now understand the progressive nature of the Revelation of God.

This allows us to better understand the difference between the Manifestations and that inmost Essence of the Divine, which is so far beyond us that we cannot even begin to truly comprehend it, and further appreciate the Beauty of God and what He has accomplished throughout the breadth of religious history.