Ponder this in thine heart, that the sweet gales of divine knowledge, blowing from the meads of mercy, may waft upon thee the fragrance of the Beloved’s utterance, and cause thy soul to attain the Riḍván of understanding. As the wayward of every age have failed to fathom the deeper import of these weighty and pregnant utterances, and imagined the answer of the Prophets of God to be irrelevant to the questions they asked them, they therefore have attributed ignorance and folly to those Essences of knowledge and understanding.
"Ponder". Every time we come across this word, or one of its synonyms such as "meditate", we stop and do just that. We ponder.
This time we are asked to ponder in our heart, which is not where we normally consider our ponderings. That is usually reserved for the head. Here, though, we are asked to use our heart, which comes up often in this book, and in the Writings of Baha'u'llah, in general.
But what are we to ponder? It could be the previous statement, "that those people of wickedness were the selfsame people who in every age opposed and caviled at the Prophets and Messengers of God, till they finally caused them all to suffer martyrdom", or the following one which says, "the wayward of every age have failed to fathom the deeper import of these weighty and pregnant utterances, and imagined the answer of the Prophets of God to be irrelevant to the questions they asked them, they therefore have attributed ignorance and folly to those Essences of knowledge and understanding". Whichever way we read it, whichever line we "ponder", we are left to see the similarities between all those who have denied the Messengers of God and caused Their persecution.
As we ponder this recurring tragedy in our heart, though, we are also reminded of the recurring joy in every Revelation. "Rejoice in the gladness of thine heart," He says in the Hidden Words, "that thou mayest be worthy to meet Me and mirror forth My beauty." Is this not what we all desire? To be worthy of meeting Him and mirroring His beauty? Maybe it is this joy that helps us be worthy, for surely this joy is a mirroring of God's love. This would be quite different from a heart that opposes and cavils, and shows anger or hatred. That in no way mirrors God's beauty.
And while there is so much we could say about this paragraph, we will limit ourselves to two more things.
First, the imagery in the winds blowing from the meadows leading us to a garden. Sometimes we find it useful to look at this imagery more closely and see what it is saying. Here we have a strong wind, not a gentle thing, but it is sweet. And what is this very strong wind? It is "divine knowledge". Strong and yet sweet. And like all winds, we can't see it, but we sure know it's there. Then we are told that it is coming across the meadows of mercy. It's not a meadow of retribution or anger, but one of mercy. Can you imagine the flowers that are growing there? Now, like all breezes blowing across a meadow, it's carrying the scent of the flowers there to us, and this sweet scent is coming from "the Beloved's utterance". I don't know about you, but if I smell a beautiful scent on the breeze, I want to go to its source. Here, by following this breeze back, it will lead us to the paradise, the Ridvan, of understanding.
So, a garden, the garden of understanding, has the flowers of His utterance giving off this beautiful perfume. This sweet perfume is carried on a strong wind across the meadows of mercy, and just waiting for us to recognize it and follow it back to its source.
Second, there is the caution of thinking the answers given by the Messengers are somehow irrelevant to the questions being asked. If seen in one way, it would appear to be a caution about this very book. After all, if you think about it, it could seem like He hasn't really answered the uncle's questions about the Bab. Remember, one of those questions was about why the Bab didn't show the sovereignty of the Promised One. Baha'u'llah hasn't answered this question most likely because it's an impossible question to answer. Instead, he has re-framed the question to its essential core as, "How did the Bab show the sovereignty of the Promised One?" The first presumes He didn't do it. The second presumes we don't understand how He did it. And it is this second question He answers. But to the prejudicial eye, they could easily claim that He didn't answer the question at all, completely missing the point.
It reminds us of Manikchi Sahib and "The Tabernacle of Unity". In the first letter we have some of Baha'u'llah's most oft-quoted statements. "Be anxiously concerned with the needs of the age ye live in..." "Ye are the fruits of one tree, and the leaves of one branch." "Whatsoever leadeth to the decline of ignorance and the increase of knowledge hath been, and will ever remain, approved in the sight of the Lord of creation." But Manikchi Sahib responded saying, basically, "You didn't answer my questions." He doesn't call Baha'u'llah mad or anything, but he definitely doesn't see the connection between his questions and the response. It seems to be the sincerity in his reply, saying "I don't get it", that prompts the next letter in which Baha'u'llah essentially says, "Actually I did", and then shows how each answer was given a very profound response.
The beauty of these two letters is that we not only get the profound replies written by Baha'u'llah, but through the second letter we get to see the original questions. And honestly? If we had written those questions to Baha'u'llah and received that first tablet as a reply, we probably wouldn't have gotten it either.
No comments:
Post a Comment